Short Circuit

August 25th, 2010

Aaah, summer. The sun, the late nights strolling about town, mini-skirts and long legs, and for the gentlemen…shorts.

Gentlemen, be careful when you stroll about town not to commit the following short fashion disasters:

No:

 

Yes:

To summarise: No to crocs, tevas, birkenstocks, or heavy sandals attached with velcro. No to socks above ankle length and above all no to dark socks or any combination of a fashion faux pas with another to make a fashion disaster (i.e. socks with tevas, or worse—dark socks with tevas). Yes to men’s leather sandals, trainers or casual sneakers with short  or no-show socks, and flip-flops only if you’re at the beach. Got it?

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

The T Series, Part 2: Post or Pre-lactarian?

August 22nd, 2010

Milk and Tea

Let’s consider taking afternoon tea, and let’s imagine we are drinking Earl Grey tea. Now, like most teas (excepting perhaps oolong or green teas), Earl Grey can be taken with milk or lemon, but not both. Today we are taking our Earl Grey with the former. We are all set – we have a pot of freshly brewed tea, china cups and saucers, a strainer replete with its little bowl; sugar cubes and silver tongs, a little jug of organic milk. Good company and rounds of English cucumber sandwiches and freshly baked scones with clotted cream and strawberry jam finish the scene.

An immediate quandary. Does one pour the milk, followed by the tea, or pour the tea, followed by the milk?

Before perhaps the early 1700s, European tea cups were typically made from a soft paste porcelain which tended not to fare well with very hot tea, and would be liable to cracking. Adding milk first ameliorates this since the hot tea makes contact with the milk rather than the porcelain directly. Hence milk was added first to stop these cups from cracking. Thus there was an association between having cheaper porcelain tableware and putting the milk in first when pouring tea. Clearly if one was fortunate (and wealthy) enough to have better porcelain, then it was not necessary to temper one’s tea with milk added a priori to one’s cup. Hence perhaps pouring milk in first is a habit we have retained from the times when only the rich could afford decent porcelain. Hence pouring tea first was something of an indicator that the pourer was wealthy.

I propose that such ideas, whilst quaint, have no real place in the mind of the English Gentleman. Having said that, I think one can make something of an argument for the pouring the milk second approach, starting with an observation from that great chronicler of twentieth century’s English culture, George Orwell, who wrote in 1946:

…by putting the tea in first and stirring as one pours, one can exactly regulate the amount of milk whereas one is liable to put in too much milk if one does it the other way round.

The English Gentleman would augment Orwell’s argument with the following observation. For tea drinkers who take sugar, adding milk before the sugar (regardless of whether the milk was added before or after the tea), will lead to a less effective dissolution of the sugar. The sugar will dissolve more rapidly in the hotter liquid than the tea-milk mixture. This would strongly suggest that those who prefer sweetened tea should add tea to the naked cup, thence sugar, and thence milk.

But hold on, Mr Orwell. Milk contains – amongst other things – proteins, relatively large and complex molecules which can be damaged (denatured) by heat: for example when milk is added to a relatively large volume of hot tea (milk poured second brigade). Such degradation of proteins (proteolysis) may result in milk with dubious flavour and poor quality. In terms of tea making the biggest risk is perhaps denaturation of the protein ß-lactoglobulin, and although this is advantageous if one is making yoghurt, this is something which the English Gentleman might want to avoid whilst pouring a cup of tea for his lady. It results in a rather unpleasant boiled milk flavour to one’s tea. Furthermore, such denaturing of ß-lactoglobulin makes the protein more able to absorb (or should one say adsorb?) water, thus making the milk less able to form an emulsion with the tea. This would suggest that adding milk to hot tea is less preferable than adding hot tea to the milk.

Let’s draw this discussion to a timely end, with the following conclusion:

Adding milk first has the advantage of avoiding proteolysis of the milk protein, but the clear Orwellian disadvantage of not being able to judge the quantity of milk and hence flavour balance of the tea. On the other hand, adding the milk second allows one to judge the exact amount of milk one wants, albeit with the risk that the overall flavour is impacted. And let us not neglect those who take sugar, recalling that sugar takers should perhaps entertain the idea of adding sugar to the hot tea before the milk.

Goodness me, who would have thought that pouring a cup of tea would be such a complex matter? At the end of the day I venture that there is no right or wrong way regarding milk before or after the tea. It is for the individual tea drinker to decide whether to pour the tea first or pour the milk first. However, rather than sitting on the proverbial fence, this English Gentleman would like to make it known that he always puts the milk in first.

Lemon, anyone?

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

Does He or Doesn’t He?

August 19th, 2010

Dear English Gentleman,

A couple of months ago I became friends with this Man. Immediately, we realised we shared a lot in common and our friendship grew quite quickly. Soon, I found myself day dreaming about romance with this Man. Little by little, the text messages we sent each other started becoming more and more ambiguous, such as him saying he was listening to a song we listened to together and was thinking about me. I felt like he was going to make a move ‘any time now’, but time went by (two months now) and nothing was happening- just those confusing texts. When we are face to face, there’s not even the most subtle hint of flirting. Not even a subtle hint of body language- you know, no accidental ‘brushing past’.

Because I had no clue how he felt, I didn’t want to make any ‘aggressive’ statements of my feelings, so I followed his lead with the ambiguous texts and perfectly casual face to face encounters. However, as time went by my feelings for him kept being fed by his ambiguous texts, until I found myself feeling quite miserable and prematurely heart-broken.

So, feeling like I had nothing to lose, a couple of weeks ago I started making more direct suggestions of my feelings for him being more than just friendly. Considering the fact that he is a very calm, mature man who seems to respect me and value our friendship, I was expecting one of the two outcomes.

Either he’d realise I was falling for him and if he didn’t feel the same way, readjust his tone and stop with the ambiguous texts to put me back on the friendship track.

OR, if what was stopping him was uncertainty of how I felt, that upon realising how I felt he’d get his act together and kiss me already!

What I didn’t expect was that neither of those would happen. He’s still continuing with the texts- saying that he’ll miss me when I move out (which might happen in the next month or so), or that the time we spend together never feels enough, and that what he’s feeling is new and very strange to him, or that he’s wishing I was there with him when he’s doing something… but when we see each other, we are really just friends sharing intellectual conversation. And he definitely doesn’t strike me as a shy man! He might be calm and quiet, but he definitely doesn’t lack confidence.

Can you explain to me what on Earth is going on?

Thank you very much.

Melissa.

Dear Melissa,

Goodness me. This is one of those difficult questions – in part because I don’t know some of the background detail. But I can still make a few educated guesses as to the underlying behaviour of your Man.

Let me start with what we do know. Your Man comes across as rather immovable: when you started making more direct suggestions as to your feelings towards him you rightly identified a couple of clear outcomes, yet neither occurred. It really seems that your Man is entirely happy with the way things stand and for some reason doesn’t want to move forwards (into a more romantic relationship), yet nor does he want to move backwards (as you say readjusting his tone and stopping with the ambiguous texts). This much appears to be the way things are, based on what you have written. Now of course the question you’d like an answer to is why? Why does your Man want to flirt with you via text messages, yet doesn’t appear to want to move things forward?

Firstly maybe your Man cannot move things forward because he’s committed elsewhere. Is there an ex (or perhaps not quite so ex) – girlfriend perhaps? Secondly, maybe it’s simply that he is afraid of commitment; perhaps he is rather attracted by the idea of moving things forward, but is afraid of losing his freedom in some way. Thirdly, perhaps he really is just a shy person, although you say that he doesn’t strike you as a shy man (but you do mention that he is quiet). Fourthly, perhaps there’s just a misunderstanding as to what each other wants in this relationship, your Man wanting to limit things to friendship, whilst you want more. But this last explanation doesn’t sit very well with the fact that you have made moves which seem to have had little or no effect on your Man’s approach towards you, nor does it explain the nature of those ambiguous text messages.

You are in a much better position than I to judge which – if any – of these possibilities might be nearest the mark. But, for what it’s worth, my gut reaction is that it’s an issue of commitment. I sense that your Man doesn’t want to make the commitment towards you which would be necessary to take the relationship to a deeper level. In a sense I suspect that he wants to have his cake and to eat it too. I think he finds it less committing and safer to flirt via ambiguous text messages than flirt in the real world.

A relationship doesn’t just need an arbitrary amount of commitment from both sides, it needs to be balanced. The deeper the relationship between you, the bigger the commitment you have towards each other. But importantly this commitment should be pretty much equal from either side. Now, from what you have written, there really does seem to be a lack of balance in this relationship. It sounds as if you are really full of commitment (after all you speak of being miserable and even heart broken), yet your Man appears to be lacking in this respect. If your Man is somewhat commitment phobic then I think that is something he has to sort out himself. You cannot do this for him. This is different to your Man being shy. You can help your man overcome shyness (a big kiss might help!), but you cannot sort out his issues with commitment.

At the end of the day you need to try and find out what your man wants from this relationship. And that will mean talking to him and asking him specifically. Equally, your Man should want to find out from you what it is you want from this relationship. If he says friendship is the way he wants to go then that’s the way it is and you need to decide if that’s for you. If he says he wants more than friendship then he needs to realise that that entails a deeper level of commitment, from both sides of the relationship. As I say he cannot have his cake and eat it too.

Good luck,

The English Gentleman

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

All Lathered Up

August 17th, 2010

Dear English Gentleman,

So I’ve been dating this girl for a few weeks and last Saturday I actually got lucky and got to spend the night at her apartment (No, don’t worry, my question is not part of your “In the Bedroom” section!). The next day, I went to use her shower and was completely bemused at the assortment of soaps, creams, shampoos, body milks, body washes, scrubs, conditioners, and other mysterious potions women seem to keep in lots of little colorful plastic containers that smelled, in order of me opening them (I guess that was a bit ungentlemany of me—opening my girlfriend’s bottles in the shower without permission—but curiosity just got the better of me!), like strawberries, honey, avocado, and some nondescript sweet and fresh soapy thing or another. Needless to say, when the time came for me to choose what to use as soap, faced with such an overwhelming array of possibilities had no idea what to do and picked one at random. You can imagine the embarassment afterwards when my new girl hugged me in the morning and upon touching me said: “Umm…did you use my hair conditioner as soap?”

So, English Gentleman, you who know everything about such matters….can you explain what all those little potions are for, or at the very least tell a confused but well-meaning bloke like me how to identify the proper bottle to reach for, when faced with a similar situation in the future?

Thanks,

Strawbery-scented Manlyman

Dear Strawberry-scented Manlyman,

I am touched by your assumption that I know about such matters, but in a sense you are right, not that I claim to know all about these things, but that a gentleman should have at least some idea as to the main themes as it were. If nothing else this sort of knowledge opens up all sorts of possibilities for presents! The following information is what I’ve gleaned over the years and is given without warranty!

Shampoos – the basis of hair care, remove dirt and oils. Shampoos are the hub about which the bathroom experience rotates. Next we have conditioners. These add shine, protect hair from drying out and allow for easier combing.

But why so many bottles? The first thing to understand is that there are different hair types. Not all women (and men) have the same sort of hair…dry is one type and oily another, with an intermediate type of balanced or normal hair. Bathroom product manufacturers take this into account. Then of course we might have thick hair or thin hair. And then one’s hair might be straight, wavy or curly. Manufacturers take this into account too. So already we are looking at 3 times 2 times 3 or eighteen possible hair types. But we have neglected the fact that curly hair comes in at least three different subtypes. So that’s a grand total of thirty different shampoos, and thirty different conditioners. Even this excludes tightly curly hair (think Whoopi Goldberg).

Given that there are probably two dozen brands of shampoo and conditioner, we are looking at something like seven hundred potential shampoos to choose from alone!

Of course your girlfriend will typically have one principal type of hair and so doesn’t need thirty different shampoos, but she might well choose several from different brands, based on things we haven’t even considered, like smell and visual appearance. Bathroom products are like food too and it’s nice to have a varied diet, perhaps one week using one brand and another week another. So there you have it, probably half a dozen of the bottles are shampoo and conditioner.

These are for one’s hair. For one’s body there’s a plethora of soaps, both traditional bars of soap and liquid soaps, and gels. These too come in a vast number of types, including exfoliating scrubs. Or, maybe your girlfriend fancies a relaxing bath…and why not? You’d expect to see bubble baths and bath oils (again note the plurality – variety being the spice of life and everything). And we are not quite finished, because after the shower or bath she might well use a rejuvenating body lotion.

Now, you may well be thinking that this all seems a bit excessive and why not just have an industrial sized container of cut-price shampoo? After all, if you are like me and read the small print on shampoo and conditioner bottles, nearly all contain essentially the same ingredients (staring with water!). But you would be missing the point. If advertisements are to be believed, the bathing / showering experience should be fun and even a bit magical. It’s a time to pamper, fragrance and moisturise one’s self. And if all it takes is a little bit of strawberry scented bubble bath or a few drops of moisturising dual formula serum with silkening pearls, or perhaps a Sicilian lime bath oil then what’s wrong with that?

So keep the conditioner for your hair and choose a body scrub for your body. And why not spend a little bit of time shopping with your girlfriend, perusing that array of seven hundred shampoos? Or even better, invite her into the bath or shower with you. Then she can perhaps demonstrate the proper way to use them for you herself…

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

Late Trains, Poor Service

August 15th, 2010

Dear English Gentleman,

I got into a huge argument with my boyfriend the other day because we agreed to meet for dinner at 7 p.m. He lives 45 minutes away on the train, and he offered to meet me outside the restaurant at that time. Now, you must know that the train station is about two blocks away from the restaurant, and as it happens, the trains arrive into this station from where my boyfriend lives every half hour. So, I go out all dressed up in a sexy miniskirt and arrive to wait for him outside the restaurant at about 6:50 p.m. as agreed.

At around 7:10, after waiting a full 20 minutes outside the restaurant, I decided to stroll to the train station to see which train my boyfriend had supposedly taken. The schedules showed trains arriving at 6:45 p.m., 7:15 p.m, and every half hour after that. Surely he would’ve taken the 6:45 train to make it in time to meet me? And yet here I was still waiting.

So I strolled back to the restaurant and waited some more. And waited. And waited.

Being here  in Northern California, you might imagine it was a little bit on the cold side, especially towards evening. In a mini-skirt and heels, you can imagine how this may put a girl in not a very happy mood…

Anyway, long story short, he finally arrived….at 7:30 p.m!!! When I asked him for an explanation, he only offered “Sorry, the train was late,” as he guided me inside the restaurant. When I told him I had been waiting for him standing outside in heels in the cold for a full 40 minutes he simply shrugged sheepishly and said that he couldn’t control the fact that the train had been 15 minutes late.

But, English Gentleman, that means that he took the 7:15 train to meet me, not the 6:45!! Don’t you think it was my boyfriend’s responsibility, if he agreed to meet me at 7:00 p.m., to take the earlier train, the one that would put him on time to meet me even if 15 minutes late, rather than the train that he *already knew ahead of time* would arrive 15 minutes *after* our agreed meeting time (and which, as it turns out, it actually arrived half an hour after our agreed meeting time)? I, of course, blew my top at him and promptly walked out of the restaurant and drove home. He has since been calling me to apologize, but insists that I am making a big deal out of nothing. I find his attitude, however, extremely disrespectful, for in taking the later train to meet me he already was expecting that I would wait for him 15 minutes at the very least (not to mention that I actually ended up waiting 40 minutes alone outside in the freezing cold!). I mean, he could’ve just said: “I’ll meet you at 7:30″ if he wanted to take the 7:15 train, don’t you think? Or am I overreacting?

Thanks,

-Luann

Dear Luann,

To answer your questions: yes, it is his responsibility to be there on time; yes, he should have told you that he was going to arrive at 7:30 pm; and no, you are not overreacting.

Of course he could have stated that he’d meet you at 7:30 pm, but I don’t think that is the point. You say that the two of you agreed to meet at 7 pm, so 7 pm it is, unless the two of you – and note the emphasis on the two of you – agree to a different time. In this day and age there’s plenty of access to train timetables and the like and it is not beyond the wit of man to work out what train to get, allowing some leeway for those delays which are rather inevitable. Clearly a train which arrives at quarter past the hour will make one late for an appointment on the hour. A more appropriate train would be the one which arrives at quarter to the hour, allowing fifteen minutes for those aforementioned delays and time to walk the two blocks to the restaurant. Now the above comments apply in my view to any meeting, and stem from common courtesy. One of the most important things one has in life is time and others’ time should be treated with respect and not wasted. Now of course this wasn’t some ordinary meeting, it was you boyfriend meeting you at a restaurant for dinner. In other words a date. You made the effort. And he wasted your time. And you were freezing cold.

What worries me is not so much that your boyfriend behaved in the way he did, rather that your boyfriend was disinterested in what had actually happened. As you say, shrugging sheepishly and saying that he couldn’t control the fact that the train had been fifteen minutes late. At best this looks stupid and at worst it’s knowingly telling a lie. Perhaps his train was late, but what about the train he should have been on in the first place?

Your boyfriend is (by definition) special to you and you show this in a variety of ways (you were there, mini-skirt and heels, no doubt looking forward to a romantic meal with him); equally you should be special to your boyfriend and he should show this too. This is not some part-time job for your boyfriend but a full-time occupation. Unfortunately the behaviour you relate fails to live up to this.

My advice is this: you are not making a big deal out of nothing. If this is genuinely an isolated incident then I think your boyfriend is still in with a chance to make things up to you although I am not sure how he might attempt this. Just stating that you are being unreasonable shows he completely misses the point. That is no different from stating that you are not special! He needs to show you that you are special despite what was a hopefully just a lapse of judgement. It is up to your boyfriend to sort this out…at the end of the day he is what he is and if he thinks it is satisfactory to be late for his girlfriend, and that his girlfriend is not always special, then he’ll need to look for someone more amenable to his style of behaviour.

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

Shaken and Unstirred

August 13th, 2010
Dear English Gentleman,

There’s this girl who is a waitress at the same restaurant where I’m a bartender and I think she has a crush on me. She keeps sending me text messages on the phone, chatting with me at the bar, and “bumping” into me in the parking lot, apparently “by coincidence”. As you can imagine this rather disrupts my usual routine, and flattering as it is to be the subject of her attentions, I’m really not attracted to her, for various reasons I don’t need to get into right now. What is the best way to politely, but unambiguously and unequivocally let her know that I do not share the same feelings for her? I don’t want to make an enemy at work, nor hurt her feelings, but if I’m too subtle the remedy might not “stick” and if I’m too explicit it may be quite embarrassing if it turns out I was mistaken and meaningless flirting with the bartender is just normal behaviour for waitress girls her age. Any ideas?

Thanks,

BartenderBoy

Dear BartenderBoy,

Don’t forget the ‘do nothing’ option. I’d recommend, at least for the time being, doing nothing explicitly to address this issue. In this way you will not hurt her feelings, nor make an enemy of her at work, plus you avoid any potential for embarrassment. By this I do not mean that you just ignore her, for that would be rude and ungentlemanly; be polite and be flattered and grateful that she notices you. (It’s always worth considering how you would feel with the other extreme – imagine she ignored you completely!).

I am assuming from what you have written that her behaviour isn’t interfering with your day to day life, nor forcing you to significantly change your lifestyle. If this is the case, then far more likely it’s a little bit of flirting and there’s no reason for you to intervene. At the end of the day we are all individuals and it’s up to each one of us to conduct our own lives, interacting with people as we find them, not trying to change others’ behaviours to suit us. After all, that makes the world a much more interesting place within which to live!

That being said, if the young waitress’ attentions truly bother you, consider perhaps inviting your girlfriend or significant other to the restaurant one evening. Show him or her around, and introduce your other half to all of the restaurant’s staff. This should unequivocally signal that you are for the time being unavailable, should anyone be interested, and requires no confrontation or awkward conversations.

Good luck, BartenderBoy!

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

Thank you!

August 12th, 2010

A big thank you to those readers and contributors who nominated An English Gentleman for the Cosmopolitan UK Blog Awards 2010. How very exciting it is to be shortlisted.

Have a look…

Cosmo Blog Awards Banner
Cosmo Blog Awards Vote!

…you will find us under Sex and Relationships. Please vote for An English Gentleman and let’s bring some elegance to the world!

Thank you,
The English Gentleman

Share:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email

Search


TAGS

An English Gentleman
Dating Blogs
© 2010 by An English Gentleman